TEST OF A PILOT INSTALLATION OF A SOIL REGENERATOR FOR GREENHOUSES


  • I.L. Boshkova Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies
  • N.V. Volgusheva Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies
  • I.I. Mukminov Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies
  • E.I. Altman Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies
Keywords: granular nozzle, airflow, temperature curves, insulation, intercomponent heat transfer coefficient, heat flow

Abstract

The relevance of the development of ground regenerative heat exchangers is determined by the need to save energy resources for heating greenhouses at night and maintaining the required temperature level during the day. The aim of the work is to study working capacity of a ground regenerator for a greenhouse when testing a pilot plant in full-scale conditions. To achieve this goal the following main tasks were solved: experimental research of soil regenerator pilot plant operation was carried out, the heating period of nozzle and cooling period were determined by the obtained temperature curves, the coefficient of intercomponent heat exchange during the heating period was estimated, the rationality of material choice for granulated nozzle was proved, recommendations on improvement of soil regenerator design for industrial use were developed. The research was conducted on a pilot installation of a soil regenerator, which consists of a heat-exchange duct filled with granulated material and covered with a layer of insulation, and ducts with an exhaust duct fan installed at the outlet. Data on air and nozzle temperatures, which were taken during the day, were used to conduct thermal calculations and assess the efficiency of the ground regenerator. It was determined that the heating period at the selected loading mass of 15.5 kg is not long relative to the duration of the experiment and was 166 min. To increase the amount of accumulated heat it is recommended to increase the weight of the nozzle and air flow rate. It was determined that the coefficient of inter-component heat transfer during the heating period varied between 4 W/m2K and 9 W/m2K. In this case, the Bio number is in the range of 0.05 - 0.10, which allows us to conclude that the use of crushed stone as a nozzle material is rational. It is recommended to increase the thickness of insulation to 4.3 cm so that the heat loss from the heat exchange section does not exceed 5%, and to provide the installation of insulated plugs at the ends of the heat exchange section, closing after the end of the heating period.

References

1. Hazami M., Kooli S., Lazaar M. etc. Thermal Performance of a Solar Heat Storage Accumulator Used For Greenhouses Conditioning // American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2005, V. 1(4), P. 270-277.
2. Savytskyi M., Danishevskyy V., Bordun M. Accumulation of solar energy to heat greenhouses // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, V. 985, Iss. 1, Р. 1-10.
3. Bazgaou A, Fatnassi H, Bouharroud R etc. Performance assessment of combining rock-bed thermal energy storage and water filled passive solar sleeves for heating Canarian greenhouse // Solar Energy, 2020, V. 198, P. 8–24.
4. Boshkova I., Volgusheva N., Solodka A. etc. Development of a soil regenerator with a granular nozzle for greenhouses // Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2020, V. 4(8-106), P. 14–20.
5. Gorbis Z. R., Kalender'yan V. A. Heat exchangers with flowing dispersed heat carriers, Moscow, Energy, 1975. – 296 p. (in Rus.)
6. Bartzanas T., Tchamitchian M., Kittas C. Influence of the Heating Method on Greenhouse Microclimate and Energy Consumption // Biosystems Engineering, 2005,V. 91, Iss. 4, P. 487–499.
7. Taki M., Rohani A., Rahmati-Joneidabad M. Solar thermal simulation and applications in greenhouse // Information processing in Agriculture, 2018, V. 5, Iss. 1, P. 83-113.
8. Mesmoudi K., Soudani A., Zitouni B. Experimental study of the energy balance of unheated greenhouse under hot and arid climates: Study for the night period of winter season // Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic and Applied Sciences, 2010,V. 9, Iss. 1, P. 27–37.
9. Pavlov G., Olesen B. Thermal energy storage—A review of concepts and systems for heating and cooling applications in buildings: Part 1—Seasonal storage in the ground // Journal HVAC&R Research, 2012, V. 18, Iss. 3, P. 515-538.
10. Almendros-Ibáñez J. A., Fernández-Torrijos M., Sobrinoc С. A review of solar thermal energy storage in beds of particles: Packed and fluidized beds // Solar Energy, 2019, V. 192, No. 1, P. 193-237.
11. Adeyanju A., Manohar K. Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Heat Transfer in Packed Beds // Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 2009, V. 4, №5, P. 166–177.
12. Albrecht K. J., Ho K. C. Heat transfer models of moving packed-bed particle-to-sCO2 heat exchangers // Proceedings of the ASME 2017 Power and Energy Conference Power Energy, 2017, June 25-30, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA Power Energy, P. 331-340.

Abstract views: 65
PDF Downloads: 39
Published
2021-10-08
How to Cite
Boshkova, I., Volgusheva, N., Mukminov, I., & Altman, E. (2021). TEST OF A PILOT INSTALLATION OF A SOIL REGENERATOR FOR GREENHOUSES. Thermophysics and Thermal Power Engineering, 43(3), 85-92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31472/ttpe.3.2021.11
Section
Monitoring and optimization of thermophysical processes