RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF THE IN-SITU BIOMETHANIZATION PROCESS ON INCREASING BIOMETHANE PRODUCTION IN CLASSIC BIOGAS PLANTS
Abstract
Objective: The study explores integrating in-situ hydrogen biomethanation into traditional biogas plants to enhance methane production. It aims to analyze biochemical mechanisms, assess the impact of operational parameters, and evaluate the feasibility of this technology for sustainable energy.
Tasks:
- Investigate biochemical pathways—hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, homoacetogenesis, and acetoclastic methanogenesis—for converting CO₂ and H₂ into methane.
- Examine how parameters such as temperature, hydrogen partial pressure, and the CO₂ / H₂ ratio influence methane production and microbial diversity.
- Assessing the potential of in-situ biomethanation as a cost-effective and sustainable technology aligned with circular economy principles.
Methods:The research employed a comprehensive literature review to evaluate the integration of hydrogen biomethanation into continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTR). Key areas included gas-phase analysis, microbial dynamics, and thermodynamic modeling to evaluate methane production pathways and constraints.
Results: In-situ hydrogen biomethanation effectively enhances methane yields by leveraging hydrogenotrophic methanogens and homoacetogens. Hydrogen introduction facilitates CO₂ and H₂ conversion into methane via hydrogenotrophic pathways, with indirect contributions from homoacetogenic and acetoclastic processes.
Key findings include:
- Parameter Optimization: The CO₂ / H₂ ratio near 1:4 maximizes conversion rates.
- Microbial Interactions: High hydrogen levels support hydrogenotrophic methanogens but can inhibit syntrophic acetate oxidation, requiring precise control of hydrogen pressure.
- Technology Integration: In-situ biomethanation adapts to existing biogas plants with minimal changes, reducing organic feedstock reliance and improving biogas quality.
Conclusion
In-situ hydrogen biomethanation emerges as a promising technology for improving methane production in biogas plants while supporting renewable energy goals. Its integration aligns with the European Union’s ambition to achieve 35 billion cubic meters of biomethane production annually by 2030. However, challenges such as hydrogen solubility limitations and the need for controlled operational conditions require further investigation. Continued research will focus on optimizing reactor configurations and scaling the technology for broader application.
References
2. Incorrys Inc. (2023, September 19). Biogas power generation capacity 2010-2022. Data, Intelligence, and Forecasts for New Energy, Environment, and New Technology. https://incorrys.com/power-generation/biogas-power-generation/biogas-power-generation-capacity-2010-2022/
3. Tracksler, I., & Potapova, M. (2024). Review of green hydrogen transformation technologies for increasing biomethane production at existing plants in Ukraine and Europe. Teplofìzika ta teploenergetika, 46(4), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.31472/ttpe.4.2024.10 (in Ukr.)
4. Geletukha, G., Hyvel, M., & Kucheruk, P. (2024). Opportunities of advanced biomethane production from microalgae grown on biogas plant digestate. Part 1. Teplofìzika ta teploenergetika, 46(4), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.31472/ttpe.4.2024.7 (in Ukr.)
5. New research Gas for Climate | Biomethane production potential in the EU | 2022. (n.d.). https://uabio.org/materials/13559/ (in Ukr.)
6. Geletukha, G., Zheliezna, T., Kucheruk, P., & Drahniev, S. (2023). Analysis of prospective directions for using Ukraine’s biomass potential for energy. Teplofìzika ta teploenergetika, 49(2), 77–86 https://doi.org/10.31472/ttpe.2.2023.9 (in Ukr.)
7. EBA Statistical Report 2023 | European Biogas Association. (n.d.). https://www.europeanbiogas.eu/eba-statistical-report-2023/
8. Lembo, G., Rosa, S., Marone, A., & Signorini, A. (2023). In situ biogas upgrading in a randomly packed Gas-Stirred Tank reactor (GSTR). Energies, 16(7), 3296. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073296
9. Corbellini, V., Feng, C., Bellucci, M., Catenacci, A., Stella, T., Espinoza-Tofalos, A., & Malpei, F. (2021). Performance Analysis and Microbial Community Evolution of In Situ Biological Biogas Upgrading with Increasing H2/CO2 Ratio. Archaea, 2021, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8894455
10. Kramar V. Biogas enrichment technologies and their characteristics. (2023). Teplofìzika ta teploenergetika, 48 (1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.31472/ttpe.1.2023.8 (in Ukr.)
11. Dombrovskyi O. G., Traksler I. S., & Potapova M. V. In-situ hydrogen biomethanization: optimization of biomethane production and biogas purification from CO₂. (2024). Vidnovliuvana Enerhetyka, 3, 140–144. https://doi.org/10.36296/1819-8058.2024.4(79)140-144 (in Ukr.)
12. Liu, R., Hao, X., & Wei, J. (2015). Function of homoacetogenesis on the heterotrophic methane production with exogenous H 2 /CO 2 involved. Chemical Engineering Journal, 284, 1196–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.081
13. Adnan, A. I., Ong, M. Y., Nomanbhay, S., Chew, K. W., & Show, P. L. (2019). Technologies for Biogas upgrading to Biomethane: a review. Bioengineering, 6(4), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6040092
14. Zhao, J., Li, Y., & Dong, R. (2021). Recent progress towards in-situ biogas upgrading technologies. The Science of the Total Environment, 800, 149667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149667
15. Zhu, X., Zhou, P., Chen, Y., Liu, X., & Li, D. (2020). The role of endogenous and exogenous hydrogen in the microbiology of biogas production systems. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 36(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02856-9
16. Agneessens, L. M., Ottosen, L. D. M., Andersen, M., Olesen, C. B., Feilberg, A., & Kofoed, M. V. W. (2018). Parameters affecting acetate concentrations during in-situ biological hydrogen methanation. Bioresource Technology, 258, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.102
17. Poggio, D., Sastraatmaja, A., Walker, M., Michailos, S., Nimmo, W., & Pourkashanian, M. (2023). Experimental evaluation of continuous In-Situ biomethanation of CO2 in anaerobic digesters fed on sewage sludge and food waste and the influence of hydrogen Gas–Liquid mass transfer. Processes, 11(2), 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020604
18. Okoro‐Shekwaga, C. K., Ross, A., & Camargo‐Valero, M. A. (2021). Enhancing bioenergy production from food waste by in situ biomethanation: Effect of the hydrogen injection point. Food and Energy Security, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.288
19. Tsapekos, P., Alvarado-Morales, M., & Angelidaki, I. (2022). H2 competition between homoacetogenic bacteria and methanogenic archaea during biomethanation from a combined experimental-modelling approach. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 10(2), 107281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107281
20. Rafrafi, Y., Laguillaumie, L., & Dumas, C. (2020). Biological Methanation of H2 and CO2 with Mixed Cultures: Current Advances, Hurdles and Challenges. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 12(10), 5259–5282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01283-z
21. Wang, H. (2016). Optimization of biomethanation focusing on high ammonia loaded processes. Welcome to DTU Research Database. https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/optimization-of-biomethanation-focusing-on-high-ammonia-loaded-pr
22. Wang, H., Zhu, X., Yan, Q., Zhang, Y., & Angelidaki, I. (2019). Microbial community response to ammonia levels in hydrogen assisted biogas production and upgrading process. Bioresource Technology, 296, 122276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122276
Abstract views: 226 PDF Downloads: 207
If the article is accepted for publication in the journal «Thermophysics and Thermal Power Engineering» the author must sign an agreementon transfer of copyright. The agreement is sent to the postal (original) or e-mail address (scanned copy) of the journal editions.
